Sticking with rivalry week at BCS Watch, today I will look at the five best Big 12 rivalries.

Big 12: Best Rivalries

1. Texas – Oklahoma

The Red River Rivalry is one of the few rivalries played at a neutral site. The game is in Dallas which is approximately half way between the two schools. The game is helped by the fact that it almost always has some kind of national significance, as well as Big 12 South implications. Texas leads in wins 57-40-5.

2. Missouri – Kansas

This game is called “The Border War”. It is one of the most hateful and bitter rivalries in all of sports. The rivalry between the two states goes all the way back to before the Civil War, where there was fighting and violence surrounded whether Kansas would be added to the Union as a slave or free state. The series is tied at 54 with 9 ties.

3. Texas – Texas A&M

The Lone Star Showdown is the name of every game in every sport between these two schools, who have even worked up a point system so all the sports are able to be used to tell which team is better. The football rivalry is the most notable of all the other rivalries for the amount of attention it receives. It is often played around Thanksgiving, giving it that holiday feel. Texas leads the series 74-36-5.

4. Oklahoma – Oklahoma State

This in-state rivalry is a part of the Bedlam Series. Oklahoma leads 79-17-7.

5. Iowa State – Iowa

This out of conference rivalry is played for the Cy-Hawk Trophy. Iowa leads 37-19.

The release of the new EA Sports game NCAA Football 10 has brought up the yearly groans and gripes leveled at how a company can get away using player likenesses without compensating them in any way. The NCAA is an organization that exists to ensure that the athletes that participate in college sports maintain an “amateur” status.  In other words, they can’t be paid for anything that results from their sporting ability. This keeps things fair. If players could be paid, then schools that were willing to pay more for higher caliber players, would be able to clean up.

This is not to say that richer schools do not already have an advantage. They are able to hire better coaches and build better facilities that attract more recruits. But actually handing the player a check does take on a more direct benefit. However, it is clear that player is responsible for loads of money coming into the program. Be it from jersey sales, to TV contracts, all the way to actually selling tickets. Not too mention how much business they have brought to television stations and EA Sports for the above mentioned video game. Is it right that everyone else should be able to make money off of the player, while the player is not allowed to make any money themselves?

It is important to remember that while the player is not receiving any monetary payment from the institution, they are receiving a free college education. That is a payment that keeps on giving. It insures that, if the player takes it seriously, whether they go into professional sports or not, they will be prepared to make money. And who wouldn’t love to not have to worry about paying off student loans after graduation.

There are a lot of other issues that come up as well. What about the less lucrative sports? Should the track and field player get as much as the star quarterback? Also, should the NCAA mandate a stipend, or let the institutions decide whether to give one. Or should the money come from the NCAA itself? There are a lot of questions to answer – and until they are completely fleshed out and the consequences have been measured, then I think things need to stay the way they are.

Today is PAC-10 Thursday at BCS Watch. Check out my selections for the five best rivalries in the PAC-10.

PAC-10: Best Rivalries

1. USC – UCLA

This is the most high profile rivalry in all of sports. There are more celebrities at this particular game than any other game of the year. While the game has not been terribly competitive lately, UCLA did cost USC a change at the 2006 national championship, getting the 13-9 upset win. USC holds the lead in the series 43-28-7.

2. USC – Notre Dame

The midwest versus the pacific. The two very different cultures collide in a rivalry game that is special because it features two teams that so far away. A Stunning difference to the kind of feeling than a in-state or border war type of rivalry game brings up. Notre Dame leads the series 42-33-5.

3. Standford – California

This rivalry is best epitomized by the “The Play” in which a squib kick was picked up and lateraled five times, and finally run into the end zone through a mass of confused Stanford marching band players who had rushed the field when they mistakenly thought the game was over. The Standford players still believe that the ball should have been called down at a certain point. Stanford leads the series 50-42-10

4. Oregon – Oregon State

Called “The Civil War” this in-state match-up is more regional than national, but it means a whole lot to the two teams involved. Oregon is leading 56-46-10.

5. Washington – Washington State

These two teams play for the Apple Cup every year. Most recently the game was unique in 2008 because both teams put forth one of the worst seasons in either one’s history. Winning this game would have been the only great thing that would have happened for either team. The game, of course, went to overtime with Washington State eventually winning. Washington, however, has the edge in overall wins 64-31-6.

I recently had the opportunity to have a nice talk with Zach Rosenfield, an analyst with AccuScore. AccuScore is a sports forecasting company, that uses computer simulations to attempt to correctly estimate how a game or season will play out. Obviously this is a very helpful thing for how crazy college football can get. Rosenfield  is the analyst that deals mainly the NCAA Football. His analysis has been featured by Wall Street Journal, Yahoo!, USA Today, Los Angeles Times. He has also appeared on several radio programs on ESPN Radio, Sporting News Radio and others. I was able to ask him a view questions for the blog.

————————————————————————————————-

BCSWatch [BCSW]: Tell us a little about AccuScore and what you do there.

Zach Rosenfield[ZR]: AccuScore is a statistical game forecasting company that uses past performances and statistical history to forecast games. We built a simulation engine that simulates games one play at a time under real game conditions (110+ variables) and then re-simulate the game 10,000 times. We had 79% accuracy in College Football last year and 67% in the NFL, which made us champions of the ESPN NFL Expert Pick Em League.

AccuScore.com is a premium site that is designed to give the fan or sports investor every bit of information they might need. We forecast player statistics, as well as who will win, by how much and the total score. Last March, we went from being a free site to a paid site and it has been very successful.

Our current partners include ESPN, Yahoo!, Wall Street Journal, Sporting News, NBC Sports, Versus, NY Post, San Diego Union Tribune, as well as more than a dozen local television affiliates nationwide.

We are a small company which is a lot of fun because I get to wear many hats. I am an analyst for multiple sports, but College Football is my primary focus. I oversee AccuScore’s various media campaigns, our editorial content that gets licensed and/or syndicated to multi-media outlets, and work with Stephen Oh on the day-to-day business and strategies behind AccuScore.com.

BCSW: That sounds really cool! Does your simulation engine ever pick any upsets that really surprise you when you first see them, but then they actually happen? Can you give us an example?

ZR: Upsets are hard to predict with a computer, but we can identify games with upset potential based on the projections for a game. The biggest surprise we see in simulations is when the probability or score is not anywhere close to what you think it would be. We saw it last year with Oklahoma hosted Texas Tech. Everyone thought the game would be close, but we had Oklahoma winning 80% of the time. That was pretty significant for a one-loss team over an undefeated team that late in the season.

Another example is last year we had OU beating Texas by four points. In that simulation, Sam Bradford was not throwing an interception and was sacked twice. We re-simulated the game with Bradford throwing two interceptions and getting sacked four times and saw that jump Texas from a 45% underdog to a 52% favorite. Ironically, Bradford was sacked four times and did throw the two interceptions and Texas went on to win that game.

It is situations like that which get you excited about what you can extract from statistical analysis.

BCSW: How do you see the upcoming college football season playing out? Is it going to a crazy year like the past couple of seasons, or do you think it will be pretty clear who the top two teams are at the end of the season, like in 2005 with Texas and USC?

ZR: The 2009 Season looks to be the easiest season to dope out on paper since 2005. With the way the pre-season rankings shape up, the schedules of the elite teams and the players who play for those teams, we are confident that it will be the winner of the SEC versus the winner of the Big 12 South.

Based on PR, schedules and players, whoever comes out of the Big 12 round robin of OU-Texas-Oklahoma State should play for the National Championship. I also think whoever wins OU-TX will go undefeated. Our preliminary projections have Texas beating both OU and OSU.

The SEC is kind of boring this year. Florida doesn’t play Ole Miss or Alabama. They host Tennessee (beat down) and then go to LSU (who is an average team). Ole Miss has both Alabama and LSU at home and we are projecting the Rebels to win them both. So that sets up Florida and Ole Miss in the SEC Championship game.

BCSW: What do you think about the SEC’s dominance over college football? Do you think any other conferences can challenge them this year?

ZR: The SEC has been very fortunate the last few years. I think they are a solid conference, but I am not one of these guys who thinks the SEC is amazing. Last year, the SEC had two really good teams. The rest were in and around average. You can say the same thing for the SEC this year. In my opinion, Florida is best team in the SEC (and the country). They are followed by Ole Miss and maybe Alabama.

That being said, Ole Miss has question marks, but I think they will be answered and we think they will represent the SEC West. Expect Alabama to really struggle without John Parker Wilson. If you try to sell me on LSU, then you just lose all credibility. They are an 8-4 at best with a very poor game coach.  Georgia and Tennessee are rebuilding, Auburn is a circus and South Carolina, Arkansas, Miss State and Vanderbilt are filler.

BCSW: Which conference would you say is the worst of the BCS conferences?

ZR: The Big East continues to disappoint. Eventually one of these years, one of the teams from that conference is going to back their way into the BCS Title Game and ruin it for everyone. At least two years ago, West Virginia was innovative and good. You cannot say the same thing for West Virginia this year.  I think the conference is too small and lacks true name programs. It’s a sad state of affairs when our conference winner (Cincinnati) is projected to win the conference with a  5-2 record.

To further demonstrate this point, we took the projected third place finishers from the other five BCS conferences and ran individual simulations with them in the Big East. North Carolina (ACC), Oklahoma State (Big 12), Iowa (Big 10), Cal (Pac 10) and Alabama (SEC) would all win the Big East by a comfortable margin.

BCSW: What are couple games this year that you are especially looking forward to?

ZR: Oklahoma-Texas should be great. Both teams will be in the top 5, there is bad blood from last year, the amount of All-American’s on the field. Also, the winner has the inside track to the BCS National Championship Game. But it’s not the most important game in the Big 12.

The “most important” game in the Big 12 is Texas at Oklahoma State on October 31. This game has the opportunity to completely undo whatever happens in Dallas and you need to look at the domino effect it will have. OSU will most likely be 7-0 going into it and be in the top 5. If Texas beats OU and OSU, then they are in the BCS Championship Game. Period. But what if Texas beats OU and loses to OSU? Then you get relive all the fun of 2008 all over again. The OU-OSU game on Thanksgiving weekend would match a top-5 OSU team against a highly ranked one-loss OU team. The magnitude of that game, the national spotlight and the BCS points that come with it will propel the winner into the Big 12 Title game. OSU wins and they are in. OU wins and they will once again be the highest ranked BCS team in a 3-way tie breaker.

I am really excited to see Ole Miss host Alabama. I think Ole Miss is legit this year and think Alabama is a paper tiger. If Ole Miss wins this game, they will most likely be 10-0 when they play LSU. Both myself and the AccuScore computer think Ole Miss wins both of these games.

USC at Ohio State has huge national championship implications. If you have Big 12 or SEC rooting interests, you need to root for USC in this game. A USC victory virtually eliminates the Big 10 from the hunt. Ohio State will need to run the table to get in the BCS Title Game. If USC beats them, they will never recover in the polls. Ohio State is the team most likely to Penn State later in this year and will need to do so to eliminate Penn State (by the way, check out the horrible PSU schedule).   It should be noted that I think USC has no chance at playing for it all. They have a new quarterback, three new linebackers and a horrible road schedule (@ OSU, @ Oregon, @ Cal, @ Notre Dame, @ Arizona State).  If they are 80% favorites in all those games (and they won’t be anywhere near that), they would be 30% to undefeated.

BCSW: What do you think about the BCS? Is it good for college football?

ZR: First off, the BCS and the misery it’s created has been great for AccuScore. It makes our ability to simulate games even more valuable to the public. Additionally, the past two years we have created a “Simulated Playoff” that has been hosted (with great success) on ESPN.com.

However, beyond those plugs I have some real thoughts on this. Most importantly, Bowls are exhibition games. And if you think they matter, you are wrong. They don’t. They are high profile exhibition games. Excluding the National Championship Game, bowl games (and the practice leading up to them) are the only actions a team will take over the course of the year that are not in line with their goals.

Sure Bowl games are fun to watch, but don’t fool yourself into thinking they are big games. A big game is a game of consequence. Where the winner has something to gain and the loser suffers. Are Boise State and Utah truly better off because they won BCS games? Their programs might be higher profile, but how did that win help that team. Beyond a trophy, what would Alabama had gained if they won in the Sugar Bowl last year.

I am not a fan of the BCS or any system where subjectivity governs over championships. Anyone who says it is great for College Football is selling you a bill of goods. However, the BCS is the system and I am fully cooperative with it until it changes. People need stop furiously dialing talk radio and learn the rules that govern this sport. Fair or not, it is the system. That being said, I welcome the day where it is settled on the field.

BCSW: It is interesting that you bring up subjectivity in regards to the rankings as a bad thing. I do not necessarily believe that a little subjectivity is all that bad. In fact, I think it is one of the reasons that college football has such a passionate following.

ZR: College football would be just as fun if you took the subjectivity out of determining who gets to play for a championship. Any time you have more than one  great team competing for a title, you have great subjective debates. However, to think that subjectivity is what fuels the passion of college football is something I don’t agree with it. People feel a kinship with their University, the reunion like tailgates, the pageantry of the sport and the competitive nature of the games. I am sure the same passion that is provoked from subjectivity could be re-purposed in other areas.

BCSW: If you were charged with creating a playoff for college football, how would your system work?

ZR: You have to take the subjectivity out of the game, or at least minimize it. All teams need to have a chance to play for the National Championship as they do in basketball. So, my proposal is simple. Make it a 10-team playoff with seven automatic bids going to the seven conference champs (SEC, ACC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10, Big East, MWC) and round it off with three at-large bids. The three at-large bids are determined by end of season rankings. The At-Large round would be #7 vs. #10 and #8 vs. #9 with the #7 and #8 having home games.

You then seed #1 through #6 by rankings, with the top four seeds getting home games in the next round (#1 vs. #8, #2 vs. #7, #3 vs. #6, #4 vs. #5). Home field advantage is a very big deal in College Football and the better teams deserve it.

After that round, go to neutral sites and you can use your bowl system. Although, do you really need to call the National Semi-Finals the “Sugar Bowl?” Don’t you think you would get just as big a game if had a catchy name like “The Final Four.”  Nevertheless, you play the semifinals at two different sites around Christmas time. Make it a tradition. Two weeks later, play the Championship game.

BCSW: Is there a specific reason you chose the MWC as the conference you added?

ZR: I don’t think you can ignore what is going on in the Mountain West. Utah, BYU and TCU are schools that high school students consider playing for, rather than settle for. And that is a big deal. I also think the offensive lines and speed these teams field would be competitive across the entire college football spectrum. The same cannot be said for the MAC.  The MAC is undersized and makes the Big 10 look explosive. I think it is a matter of safety on the field (just ask Hawaii). That being said, with three at-large entries, there would be room for a team like Ball State who made a strong run last year.

However, Ball State is the perfect example. The feather in their cap last year was beating Indiana. Please name me one other team in the top 30 who would place so much excitement on beating the Hoosiers. I am not saying a MAC team can’t rise up and win a game, but I don’t think you can carve out a guaranteed spot for them in a playoff. Watching Hawaii play Georgia was similar to watching the first  half of the “Little Giants” play the Cowboys in that Rick Moranis movie.

———————————————————

A big thanks to Zach for taking the time to answer these questions. Be sure to check out AccuScore.com.

This week is rivalry week on BCS Watch. And Wednesdays are Big Ten Wednesdays. So, partake of my list of the best rivalries in the Big Ten.

Big Ten: Best Rivalries

1. Ohio State – Michigan

The quintessential rivalry in college football. There is no college football rivalry better than the annual grudge match between Ohio State and Michigan. There is no fancy trophy. It doesn’t have a special name. The game pretty much speaks for itself. Michigan currently leads the series 57-42-6. The game is traditionally the last game for each team.

2. Michigan – Notre Dame

This out of conference rivalry has been going strong for a number of years. Some Michigan fans have said that Ohio State is the team they love to hate. But Notre Dame is the team they just plain hate. Michigan leads the series 20-15-1.

3. Penn State – Ohio State

This rivalry has been boosted in recent years as both teams have been ranked pretty high at the time of the game the past couple of years. Before Penn State joined the Big Ten, they did not play very often. The series is exactly tied at 12 games.

4. Michigan – Michigan State

The in-state battle between Michigan and Michigan State is always a hotly contested battle. While Michigan owns the better record at 67-29-5. Many of the more recent contests have been very close and exciting games.

5. Wisconsin – Minnesota

This is the battle for Paul Bunyan’s Axe. Earlier in the rivalry the two teams played for the “Slab of Bacon”. That’s right. Bacon. If there ever was something worth fighting for. Minnesota has the edge in this rivalry 59-51-8.

Today is Big 10 Wednesday at BCS Watch. Your regularly scheduled post on the best rivalries in the Big 10 will be coming shortly. But first I thought it would be relevant to share a couple of items about the Big 10 that I think might make it less of the whooping boy it is today among the media and pundits. Jim Delany has his own ideas, but these are mine. Let me know what you think.

1. First they need to have games at least up until the last weekend in November. The Big 10 owns one of the longest layovers between the end of the regular season and the bowl games. They need to end the season closer to when everybody else does. It keeps things fresher and less rusty.

2. They need to cut a member. Everyone keeps talking about the Big 10 adding a team, but I think they need to decrease in size.  They would then be able to play a true round robin schedule like the PAC-10 does today. This will increase the number of conference games, and decrease the chances all the teams have to play cupcakes. This improves the schedule and give them better opportunities to have a true champion of the conference.

3. Finally, and this is most important, they need to score a few good wins against tough competition. They have to win the games they used to be able to win. It will not take too many victories to change public opinion. If Illinois beats Missouri, Ohio State best USC and Michigan beats Notre Dame, that will be a good start and I think the tide will begin to change pretty dynamically after that. It’s all about being able to win when the whole country is watching.

Continuing the theme for the week. Today I will take a look at the best rivalries in the ACC.

ACC: Best Rivalries

1. Florida State – Florida

Many of the rivalries in the ACC are inter-conference rivalries. The top one is no exception. Aside from usually having a huge national significance, as either or both of the teams are usually ranked very high at the time of the game, it is an in-state rivalry. The players usually played against each other in high school, which always adds to the intensity. The fact that Florida is one of the most talent states when it comes to football talent and it is not hard to understand the hatred.

2. Clemson – South Carolina

Another in-state rivalry, this one is one of the fiercest in the nation. Clemson is currently leading the overall series 65-37-4. The rivalry got jolt when Steve Spurrier took over for South Carolina.

3. Florida State – Miami

This game has recently been played every year, the first week of the season. In my mind this lessons some of the significance. The rivalry is heated for the very same reasons as the Florida State Florida rivalry, however this one has conference implications. It is third on my list instead of first because lately the game has not had much meaning as they both have been down.

4. Virginia – Virginia Tech

A forth in-state rivalry in the conference! The rivalry spans many different sports, but football is very much more evenly matched that some of the other sports. Virginia Tech only has an 11 game lead in the series 48–37–5. Given how good Virginia Tech has been recently I would have expected that number to be much bigger.

5. Boston College – Miami

The only one on my list that is not an in-state rivalry, this rivalry was spurred by the Hail Mary by Doug Flutie in 1984, in which Flutie threw a 52 yard pass in 30 mile per hour winds in order to put the Eagles on top with zeroes on the clock.

Over the week an very interesting post landed in my Google reader from College Football Cafeteria. They are a very good blog and I am excited to see what they have to say when the season gets going. In the interest of healthy debate they made a call out to anyone who might defend the BCS. Here I am answering the call.

First of all, I don’t consider myself pro-BCS. I consider myself pro-college football and currently college football is flourishing with the current system. Fans are excited, people are watching, and money is being made. I don’t think that you can argue that the BCS is negatively affecting those three very important areas. In fact, the industry of college football has done nothing but grow since the BCS has been invented. A big part of it is the money. The other big part is that people LOVE to hate the BCS. They tune in to all the games hoping for chaos. They turn on ESPN and if the BCS comes up they are glued to the TV. They call in on radio shows and bash and bash and bash. And the BCS goons that live in their evil layer 30 stories underground sit back in their chair, pet their cat, and think to themselves. “Yes. It’s working. Just like we’d hoped.”

In all seriousness, BCS creates drama and controversy and people eat, sleep and drink drama and controversy. Would a playoff change that? Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn’t. But to the business man in me, I got to ask, why risk it? Why change a system that is providing exactly what we need. The only way you are going to motivate the business men that run this thing would be to stop watching. Stop talking about it. That is the only thing that is going to perk their interest. If they stop getting rich. But people are too interested to stop. And that’s how you know its working.

Aside from that argument, which I think is pretty strong, there are few other things I would like to mention

I am not someone who touts that the regular season is already a playoff. That is obviously not the case, as it is proven that teams could go undefeated and still be left out. That would obviously not happen in a playoff. But I will say that the importance of the regular season IS decreased in playoff situations. It depends on the type of system as to how much it is decreased – but they all decrease it in some way. That is because the BCS rewards teams based on different criteria than a playoff would. Let me explain.

The playoff intends to reward a team that is better than all the other teams after the season. In other words the team that finishes the season as the best, most talented team.

The BCS, however, intends to reward a team that has accomplished the most throughout the course of a season. Teams that beat the best teams without losing to worse teams.

The distinction may not seem obvious to you but it is there in a big way. The BCS is about what you HAVE done (i.e. the regular season – the body of work). A playoff is about what you COULD do (i.e. beat every other team). Because the emphasis in a playoff is shifted from a HAVE done to a COULD do then it no longer matters how good you were when the season started, but how good you are when it is ended. Earlier games intrinsically take on lesser meaning. BCS gives the same weight to the first game as to the last game, but the playoff system is more interested in the how well the team performs in the last games (the playoffs).

This decreased importance is bound to have an effect to some degree as to the general level of excitement for some of the earlier games, much like we see in college basketball. Obviously the greater the number of teams in the playoff, the less important the regular season will get.

One other thing I would like to mention and I will be brief here because I have already posted on this topic earlier. It is silly to consider automatic berths into a playoff system for all eleven conferences. To assume that winning the MAC or the Sun Belt, is comparable to winning the PAC-10, or ACC is absurd. To reward those teams with the same benefit is an astronomical mistake. Not all conferences are created equal, and to pretend they are is to devalue the accomplishments made by teams that manage to win the much more difficult conferences.

Today begins my five week 2009 season preview. During this time I will focus on one topic each week and one conference each day. This week the topic is the best rivalries. During this time it will be Big East Monday, ACC Tuesday, Big Ten Wednesday, PAC-10 Thursday, Big 12 Friday, and SEC Saturday.

Big East: Best Rivalries

1. Pittsburgh – West Virginia

The Big East is not a conference known for huge football rivalries. While the picking is pretty slim, the Backyard Brawl is probably one on the fiercest rivalries in college football. This game has been played 101 times, so you know that it has a tremendous amount of history. The proximity between the two schools, plus the fact that it is a border war makes it pretty obvious why the rivalry is so heated. Pittsburgh has the most wins in the series with a record of 61-37-3.

2. Louisville – Kentucky

The Battle for the Governors Cup is an extension to the heated college basketball rivalry between these two schools. While the football rivalry may take second place to the basketball game each year, this is still the most important game for either team all year. Kentucky leads in victories 12-9.

3. Cincinnati – Louisville

The rivalry with the second most amount of history is the Cincinnati – Louisville. This battle for the Keg of Nails has going on since 1929. Louisville and Cincinnati have been in the same conference since 1975, spanning three separate conferences: Missouri Valley, Conference USA, and now, the Big East.

4. Cincinnati – Pittsburgh

One of the newer rivalries, but no less intense is the River City Rivalry. Since 2005 they have play for the Paddlewheel Trophy every single year. They played a few times prior to 2005, with Pittsburgh leading the series 7-1.

5. West Virginia – Syracuse

West Virginia and Syracuse have met each other in every season since 1955. They play for the Ben Schwartzwalder Trophy, named for a for former player at West Virginia who went on to coach at Syracuse.

1. At Big Ten media days a blogger will ask Jim Tressel if he is a virgin. “I’m married and have four kids!” – “So… that’s a ‘no’ then?” The blogger will later write the post: “SEC: Better At Abstinence Too”.

2. After Tebow-gate at the SEC media days, Steve Spurrier will be continually asked about Tim Tebow. Eventually he will snap, start turning green and his muscles will grow to the size of trees. “You wouldn’t like me when I’m angry!” He will later be forced to resign.

3. The MWC, continuing it’s barrage against the BCS, will hold a rally in which they will assure their loyal fans that they used disappearing ink when they signed the BCS bowl agreement with ESPN and their affiliated bowls the week before. “But we still get the money!”

4. Mike Slive, commissioner of the SEC, will announce that he will run for President of the United States in 2012. He expects to win 100% of the vote, siting how even though there is a recession, the SEC has made everyone involved insanely rich.

5. Yankee Stadium will announce that the Yankee’s will no longer be playing their games in their new stadium. Instead it will become a permanent college football stadium, playing host to different teams from around the country every week. “Manhattan has always been the premiere college football destination! Now there will actually be games here!”